Guidant Recall
On June 17, 2005, Guidant issued a voluntary recall of its implanted cardiac defibrillator. The Guidant recall is linked to at least 45 failures of the device and the deaths of two patients.
Guidant Defibrulator Lawsuit

Guidant Recall Information
About Defibrillators
About Pacemakers
Contact an Attorney
FDA Recalls Guidant Pacemaker
Guidant Pacemaker Recall
Guidant Press Release
Health Related Links
Recalled Defribrillators
Recent FDA Updates Concerning Guidant

Claim Information
Heart Conditions and Diseases
Heart Health

 

If you would like to receive information regarding potential new lawsuits, class actions, lawsuit settlements and large verdicts, please enter your name and email address below, and press "submit".







Guidant Recall Attorneys Free Legal Consultation Guidant Defibrulator Recall Contact an Attorney
Guidant Recall Attorney

File a Claim for the Guidant Defibrulator Recall

Your Time to Act is Limited. Click Here to Contact an Attorney

Click Here to Find Out If Your Pacemaker Has Been Recalled.

       On June 17, 2005, Guidant announced the initiation of a voluntary recall of certain pacemakers.  It has been discovered that a seal within the device can leak, allowing moisture to damage electronic components.  Such damage can affect the device’s ability to pace the heart or can cause an accelerated heart rate. Guidant sent a letter to physicians describing the problems and providing recommendations about how to decrease the risk of pacemaker failure.

       Guidant’s recall has been categorized as a Class 1 recall, the FDA’s most serious designation.  This means there is a reasonable probability that the malfunctioning device will cause serious adverse health consequences or death.  Given that many patients are very dependent on such pacemakers to maintain an adequate heart rate, this news is significant for the nearly 30,000 people worldwide who have the affected devices installed.

       The clinical behaviors related to a malfunctioning device can be serious.  In some cases, patients have experienced syncope, more commonly referred to as “fainting” or “passing out.”  On two occasions, patients sustained Maximum Sensor Rate (“MSR”) pacing in which heart failure may have developed due to the sustained high rate pacing.  In one instance, a patient was admitted to the hospital after experiencing sustained MSR along with multiple other health issues and later died.

       Guidant has recommended to physicians that they consider each case on an individual basis when evaluating what measures to take with regard to a defective device.  Additionally, patients have been advised to immediately seek medical attention if they notice shortness of breath, dizziness, lightheadedness or a prolonged fast heart rate.

       If you have been injured as a result of a defective Guidant Pacemaker, you may be entitled to monetary compensation.  For a free review of your claim, please complete a free consultation form.  A lawyer will review your form and may contact you to discuss your case.

Hot Topics: Drugs and Heart Attacks
Nelnorm heart attack
Avandia heart attack
MRI Skin NSF
Paxil Birth Defect
Permax heart attack

Copyright © 2009 Guidant Recall Attorneys .com All Rights Reserved Small Business Web Design


Click on Your Model to Contact an Attorney

Guidant Recall Defibrillators

 

Guidant Pacemakers Recalled

 

Guidant CRT and Defibrillator Model Numbers:

 

Guidant Pacemaker Model Numbers Recalled:

  • 0470
  • 0476
  • 0481
  • 0870
  • 0970
  • 0972
  • 0976
  • 0981
  • 1170
  • 1171
  • 1172
  • 1174
  • 1175
  • 1176
  • 1180
  • 1181
  • 1184
  • 1186
  • 1187
  • 1241
  • 1270
  • 1272
  • 1273
  • 1274
  • 1275
  • 1276
  • 1280
  • 1283
  • 1284
  • 1285
  • 1286
  • 1349
  • 1380
  • 1384
  • 1385
  • 1480
  • 1483
  • 1484
  • 1485
  • 1499

CRT

  • Contak Renewal
  • Contak Renewal 2
  • Contak Renewal 3 (Class II)
  • Contak Renewal 4 (Class II)
  • Contak Renewal Model H135 (Class I)
  • Contak Renewal Model H155 (Class I)
  • Renewal AVT (Class II)
  • Renewal 3 AVT (Class II)
  • Renewal 4 AVT (Class II)
  • Renewal RF (Class II)

 

GUIDANTRECALLATTORNEYS.COM is owned and operated by the Sheff Law Offices, P.C. and is in no way affiliated with Guidant.  The The purpose of this web site is to provide basic information about the Guidant Recall, litigation and/or other select legal topics. The GUIDANTRECALLATTORNEYS.COM web site is owned and operated by Sheff Law Offices, P.C., and does not offer legal advice, recommendations, mediation or counseling. For more information please see our legal disclaimer.

For Case Related Inquiries Contact:
Justin R. Cook, Esquire
(888)423-4477
(617) 227-7000

_____________________________

Sheff Law Offices, P.C.
10 Tremont Street

Boston, MA 02108

(888) 423-4477

Also Investigating: Fosamax Osteonecrosis,
Ketek Liver Injuries & Whistle-blower Qui Tam claims